Russia’s Wild 1990s Are Coming To America (Video Essay)

[This is the transcript for Alex Sheremet’s video essay on Russia’s Wild 1990s, told through the eyes of murdered American journalist Paul Klebnikov. “The Murder and Resurrection of Paul Klebnikov” can be watched here. The transcript originally appeared in Alex’s literary magazine, AUTOMACHINATION.]

“God did not create all men equal. What is inside them is not equal.” – Khoza Noukhayev

Twenty years have passed since the killing of Paul Klebnikov (Павел Юрьевич Хлебников) on a Moscow street. Although he was an American citizen, born in America to American-born parents, his unsolved murder is better known in Russia than in the United States. A business journalist for Forbes Magazine, Paul Klebnikov’s seminal book, Godfather of the Kremlin: Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia, must be read in softcover. The hardback is long out of print and there are no electronic versions available. Paul is known as Pavel in Russia—another man, almost, for his death had even deeper implications abroad. Today, Klebnikov would be 61 years old. He is, like the Russians looking back, grounded in time, as the country they leave behind grows older, stranger, with a future not their own. Yet Klebnikov flowed in the opposite direction, towards Russia, as America itself grew less and less recognizable. After all, if one points to the dangers of journalism in Russia, Russia can point to America’s increasing tolerance for the murder of their own journalists on foreign soil. In the minds of oligarchs and warlords—the world Paul Klebnikov got … Continue reading →

The Limits of Joy: How Kamala Harris Can Lose In 2024

[This essay was first published in Alex Sheremet’s AUTOMACHINATION literary magazine. For a post-mortem on the 2024 election, check out Alex Sheremet’s video essay on the reasons for Donald Trump’s win.]

Though the outcome of America’s upcoming election is a foregone conclusion, not all is lost. Either Trump or Kamala will inherit an economic slowdown, a voting population at turns radicalized and ambivalent, and a degraded country stuck in frozen conflict—with only some of it abroad. Neither Trump nor Kamala have the tools to deal with insoluble problems, while the freakish nature of this cycle’s independent candidates suggests how little can be produced through the miasma. And yet, the Democratic Party’s latest crisis provides a rare glimpse into political power, down to the brazen discussion of how Joe Biden was forced to give up his re-election campaign. Insiders are accused of plotting a ‘coup’, but this word suggests something out of the ordinary. In reality, both parties are financed by corporate bribes and beholden to special interests. If funding dries up, the campaign is over—a fact that, to quote Nancy Pelosi, can be impressed upon the candidate “the easy way, or the hard way”. At the time, I suggested the Party lean into its undemocratic principles, such as calling for a fake primary (if there should be a primary at all) ending with Kamala Harris’s anointment. Now that this has transpired, it is instructive to reflect on why. For, despite Kamala’s decision to run on “joy”, … Continue reading →

Continue reading

How 2024 Came To Pass: Grading Joe Biden’s Presidency

[This article first appeared under a different title in 2021, in my literary magazine, AUTOMACHINATION. Its core prediction has come to pass: Joe Biden, for structural reasons, has been unable to enact the reforms voters might consider ‘good enough’, even as crises pile up. COVID measures went from punitive to laissez faire; inflation has suppressed real wages, leaving Americans feeling worse-off than in 2019; lobbyist spending has led to political and humanitarian disaster with unqualified, bipartisan support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza; nonwhite voters have continued to leave the Democratic Party; the militarization of police has accelerated; any promise to reverse Trump’s tax cuts was dead from the beginning. I argued that Joe Biden would be more superficially ‘progressive’ than Barack Obama, but that it wouldn’t be enough to really be felt. The response to Trump’s 2024 campaign has been to disqualify and/or imprison him, largely due to the fact that the Biden administration was paralyzed from the beginning. These are sentiments echoed by Benjamin Studebaker in our discussion of American democracy.]

In the last few decades, the term forever war has come to denote an unpleasant fact for imperial ambition- namely, that superpowers have ceased to exist, dislodged by regional actors limited to their own spheres of influence, while influence itself grows narrower and more abstract. Thirty years after America failed to take Vietnam, it would fail for much the same reason in Afghanistan and Iraq: lately, empire cannot explain its purpose even to itself, much … Continue reading →

Continue reading